Oracle vs. Google Lawsuit (Android and Java) Research Paper

Oracle vs. Google example (Android and deep br declare) - Research Paper ExampleGoogles Android infringes Oracle Americas copyrights in Java and Google is not licensed to do so. The seven patented technologies in question are 6,125,447 (Protection Domains To Provide auspices in a Computer System) 6, 192,476 (Controlling Access to Resource) 5,966,702 (Method and Apparatus for Preloading of Classes Through Memory Space Cloning of a Master Runtime System Process RE38,104 (Method And Apparatus For Resolving Data References In Generate Code - A reissued patent the original number was 5,367,685) 6,910,205 (Interpreting Functions Utilizing A Hybrid Of Virtual And Native Machine Instructions) and, 6,061,520 (Method And System for do Static Initialization) (EndSoft Patents 2012). The Java technology was developed by Sun Microsystems now called Oracle America, after its skill by Oracle. The deal, valued at $7.4 billion, strengthened Oracles objective to out-consolidate its rivals, which was already buoyed by front acquisition of several large companies (Shankland 2010). Because of this, Oracle became a hardware company as well, with an integrated mathematical product being pitched to the customers as a combination of hardware and software solution. Android is a Google product, developed in its move to expand in the nimble computing market. It was originally created by Android Inc., which Google bought in 2005. Today, Android is being maintained and developed by the Open Handset Alliance, which is a consortium of 86 hardware, software and telecommunications organizations led by Google. Legal Issues Oracles claims of code infringement had been modified in October 2010, which further specified its complaint against Android. In its amended claim filed before the court, Oracle alleged that Google flagship operating(a) system is using or copying Java technologies in its class libraries and documentation, further stressing that approximately third of Androids API packa ges are derivative of the Java API packages, including examples of code that aim to prove its point (Lopez-Tarruella, 2012, 279). For Googles alleged copyright and patent infringement, Oracle originally asked for over $2.4 billion in order to indemnify for the damages, which, of course, Google countered as inflated (Latif 2012). Oracle has revised this figure as it amended its complaints several times. Today, it stands at $168 million. Google let off think the figures as baseless. In a legal strategy designed to fend off attacks or at least protect its Android ecosystem from lawsuits such as that lodged by Oracle, Google has acquired Motorola Mobility its trove of patented ready and computing technologies, in addition to the thousands acquired from IBP Patents. The rationale for this move is simple. With a comprehensive range of important mobile and future mobile technologies, Google is in a better position to protect the companies that use Android because it could peril Oracle with counter license suits. Also, Google could refuse to license technologies to companies such as Microsoft, Nokia and perhaps Oracle if it starts its own mobile computing program in the future. Finally, Google through its newly acquired patents - could enter into cross-licensing deals with these companies in exchange for drop the lawsuits or being amenable