Compare and evaluate multiculturalism and assimilation as alternative Essay

Compare and evaluate multi heathenishism and assimilation as alternative approaches to transaction with immigrator populations. Use evid - Essay ExampleThe rate of immigration has doubled in the last five decades alone, score for the greater proportion of workers in the industrialized nations of the world (Shah, 2008, para. 4). The estimated number of world-wide immigrants represented about three percent of the global total population. Many of these immigrants either came from Asia or Africa, and most of them are undocumented migrant workers using illegal means or channels to gain entry. Half of all immigrants are women separate than the reasons cited earlier, immigrants excessively choose to leave their own countries due to ethnic persecution (if they belong to a minority), avoidance of array or armed conflicts, and political harassment. A new reason recently cited as driver for increases in immigration is increased globalization, in which their original home countries suffer ed from open trade policies, making them losers due to greater economic inequality (ibid. para. 8). Some people also immigrate for better educational opportunities while others do so for a good retirement place in another country, such as a warmer climate and lower costs of living. An improvement in transportation technologies, cheaper travel rates, and shorter travel measure have in many ways also contributed to the heightened phenomenon of global immigration today. Discussion The United Nations considers international migration as one of the basic human rights, and the sacred right to degagedom of travel and movement is include in its Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Relatedly, basic human rights apply to everybody, whether as an immigrant or not the U. N. agency charged with carrying out this mandate is the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (or UNESCO) to encourage all portion states to respect all rights of immigrants at par or level with that of its own native citizens (Ban, 2007, para. 1) and to promote the speedy, orderly, and cool integration of migrants to society in general. It is quite ironic how many Western countries had previously urged Russia and China, in the other(prenominal) decades, to allow their citizens to move freely and migrate if they want to go, but now these Western countries are antipathetic to accept more migrants and put up hindrances, controls, or new laws to limit immigration. Admittedly, there are benefits to free immigration such as lower labor costs that help the host country, contribute to cultural diversity of society, enhance mutual understanding, alleviate labor shortages, and increase the talent pool of the nation (Fassi, 2011). Moreover, countries with declining populations also benefit from new people. But on the other hand, some people resist immigrants because of competition for exactly jobs, cultural adulteration or influences, social adjustments, increased demands on soc ial services like health care, policing, sanitation, food, housing, educational facilities, welfare and pension benefits, among others (Sterba 2009). In some European countries, a new element of the drawbacks of immigration has been added, that of cultural conflicts, social intolerance, and religious extremism. Some immigrants resist integration, and prefer ethnic segregation. Precisely due to these lively and other incipient problems related to new immigrants, various countries have tried several approaches towards achieving faster